PlayIt4ward-Furman University

Comparison of online dating sites wiki

Dating Sites Comparison




❤ : Comparison of online dating sites wiki


If it is truly notable someone else probably already created the page. I could list a lot of popular dating site missing here and the majority of links listed here are not noteworthy enough to be listed here. If this list is only about 10 items long, it could be argued that the entire article lacks usefulness, because it isn't doing its job.


comparison of online dating sites wiki

It is a reviewed site unlike the other spamming sites. Black singles interested in casual sex and affair dating sites, which is to say that our culture still seems to be popular.


comparison of online dating sites wiki
Can you show me that the sites I listed do not have an active presence in the countries listed. Create friendships and a date may just become an unexpected outcome. Debate with individual contributors and does not reflect the official views of the united states and other. Never assume that someone knows your diagnosis until you told them face-to-face, regardless of the circumstances surrounding your meeting. There are less than 5 actually free dating sites I have found and I think listing the 100% FREE dating sites is important. To use your own example, I found through Yahoo.

Dating Sites, Ranked - After that, start surfing the local personals, and link up with anyone you think is attractive.


comparison of online dating sites wiki

If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the and see a list of open tasks. This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's. This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's. Family and relationships Wikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationships Template:WikiProject Family and relationships Family and relationships articles How come when I add a site name here it is deleted? Basically, you can only add new item if the article exists. What about the sites that have a specific focus, and therefore are not terribly large -- but are highly relevant to those within that focus? Why limit this list to only sites that have a PR budget to maintain a Wikipedia page? Is this really a useful basis for filtering? Is there any empirical support for that? Almost all of the remaining entries on this Talk page are nominations of pretty reasonable candidates for inclusion on the list -- and existence of a Wikipedia article seems really counter to making this list genuinely useful, as opposed to a plaything for JohannVanbeek to revert. If that is true, then CREATE the wiki page for the site that you like yourself. Submit that separate page, get it approved by editors as relevant and NOTABLE read for reasoning , and then include it in the Online Dating Website wiki page. You don't need a PR department or budget. If it is truly notable someone else probably already created the page. As I am connected to WinkedAt I would like others to check and give their opinion and of course I would like them to add the site and the idea. It is just as notable and reviewed as the other big name ones, yet is free. It is a reviewed site unlike the other spamming sites. I'm fine with removing the external link to the site, but bias should not affect the placement of this site. Although I don't own the page or Wikipedia, I authored this page with the intent of including sites such as POF. Since the article has now been restored, I restored the link. The article fits and. I'll see what I can do. And beyond that, the place to start is to create articles on the global sites first, rather than adding non-notable sites to this list. The non-notable sites, and the tag, need to be removed. Wouldn't adding international sites warrant the removal of the tag? That's at least 10 countries over 3 continents, and that's not including , which sets no physical limitations that I can see, or , which appears to be available in whatever language Yahoo is available. Is that enough yet, or do we need to find articles about African dating sites? There are probably lots of them to add. Internet usage isn't exactly very high in Africa even Yahoo! Should the tag stay there until someone invents SouthAfricaDate? What if that never happens; should the tag stay on the article forever? You've moved the goalposts now, as well. Can you show me that the sites I listed do not have an active presence in the countries listed? Instead of complaining about a lack of globalism for globalism's sake, you could try and find these mystery sites, or at least show that they exist. It seems if I ran a global dating site I wouldn't want every country to be using the same main page or user interface or language. To use your own example, I found through Yahoo. A quick googling resulted in and so African dating sites exists. There are probebly lots of Asian dating sites as well. Non-notable sites should not be on this list. Can we take the tag off now? There are less than 5 actually free dating sites I have found and I think listing the 100% FREE dating sites is important. Another 100% Free Dating website I found that also has a nationally syndicated TV series on the major networks. I mean, the point of a list is to LIST, not give an extremely brief mention to a subject or cherry-pick. People keep arguing on here about Notability and what-not, but that's only really relevant concerning articles, not single items on a list, and there are MUCH larger lists of items on Wikipedia of MUCH lesser importance. And to the individuals deleting any entry on this list that doesn't have its own Wikipedia article: There's absolutely no justification for that. Wikipedia has no rule that I'm aware of stating that nothing can be mentioned that doesn't already have its own article, especially concerning external links. If this list is only about 10 items long, it could be argued that the entire article lacks usefulness, because it isn't doing its job. I can imagine that www. No idea if it's true. The warning says no external links, but all the sources are external links. I found a credible site that has the missing statistics, and added the user base for chemistry. I would source it but I read the warning above the page. Exactly what is common practice here. Right now it looks like an un-cited piece of information. Would love guidance here. Thanks 11:18, 12 January 2010 UTC That just means that all list entries should be links to Wikipedia articles. A great many users come here seeking to promote their nonnotable dating site by adding a link to it. Links to references are fine. Shall I have a go at fixing these things, or would someone more invested in the article like to go first? Not sure what the answer is other than maybe making them 0's if there is no rating. Why are they not listed. It was citing the inclusion of , , and. Teten, David; Allen, Scott 2005. The virtual handshake: opening doors and closing deals online. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list -- 19:11, 1 January 2011 UTC I think there should be a listing of those three dating websites as they are notable, because they are the only such services. This would better reflect the state of affairs on dating websites and be more inclusive of bisexuals. It is the only dating site where members can find out if they have mutual friends or similar Facebook Likes with other members. It is increasing rapidly in popularity and should not be removed from this list, especially as it is the only totally free app here. This is not true. Meetic does require payment. That is the case with OKCupid, which works fine free but sells you a membership with extra options. But with Meetic, you cannot contact other users, nor answer when they contact you, without taking the upgrade. It is therefore not possible to arrange a date unless both parties are paid-up members. The ability to browse profiles free is just the bait. Was there a reason for choosing this color combination? I undid the change. Let's see if there's a huge outcry from my rollback. If there is a reason for this being partial, then I think it should be specified why, as I think the word is very missleading. So I am going to change those with this as the reason. I'm aware that some companies own multiple matchmaking sites, and I would prefer to try a new service that is under different ownership. For this reasons many other dating sites get removed. The biggest dating sites are pof. But also medium sized dating sites that exist for over 10 years such as www. I could list a lot of popular dating site missing here and the majority of links listed here are not noteworthy enough to be listed here. Sites listed in the table need to have a Wikipedia article and the article must exist before the site is added to the table. Websites without Wikipedia articles may not be added to the list, and websites with a Wikipedia article should not be randomly removed based on any individual editor's notion of what is and is not popular. Websites need to meet the notability requirement descibed in order to be suitable for a Wikipedia article. I started to add it, but the more I look at it the more I think it shouldn't qualify. It looks like an official site might be in the works, though. Other sites have only 70 ppl online and more looks like a forum. Could you be more specific with which you mean? Do you mean more sites should be added or that the existing information should be updated? The comparison is between those dating websites that have Wikipedia articles, rather than all dating sites that exist, btw. Please take a moment to review. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit for additional information. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than using the archive tool instructions below. This message is updated dynamically through the template last update: 15 July 2018. Please take a moment to review. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit for additional information. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than using the archive tool instructions below. This message is updated dynamically through the template last update: 15 July 2018. Please take a moment to review. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit for additional information. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than using the archive tool instructions below. This message is updated dynamically through the template last update: 15 July 2018.


Make Her Want You- Who Was The First Online Dating Site
Can you show me that the sites I listed do not have an active presence in the countries listed. Create friendships and a date may just become an unexpected outcome. Debate with individual contributors and does not reflect the official views of the united states and other. Never assume that someone knows your diagnosis until you told them face-to-face, regardless of the circumstances surrounding your meeting. There are less than 5 actually free dating sites I have found and I think listing the 100% FREE dating sites is important. To use your own example, I found through Yahoo. الفرق بين : زواج المسيار ..وزواج المتعة .. والزواج العرفي Date night upper west side Free dating site ghana

Views: 3

Tags: Comparison, dating, of, online, sites, wiki

Comment

You need to be a member of PlayIt4ward-Furman University to add comments!

Join PlayIt4ward-Furman University

Up To Date Support

Total Money Raised  2011 -2017 :

$18,282.00

Total Items Donated:

- 37 Jackets

- 11 Blankets

- lacrosse equipment

- 20 pillow pets

© 2021   Created by PlayIt4ward.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service